On a wall

London—October, 1991.

I — The Person Specification

The Person Specification began with an ordinary bureaucratic phrase. In recruitment, a person is translated into a list of qualities that can supposedly be named, demonstrated and assessed. I wanted to ask what happens when one of those qualities is metaphysical, unverifiable—and nevertheless effective.

II — Off Work

In Off Work, the Archons fail to appear. Yet their absence creates a vacancy into which something decidedly human enters: attraction, complicity and opportunity. Billy leaves, while David—who proposed the metaphysical strategy—remains. I wanted to explore how quickly a person specification can become a process of selection of an entirely different kind, and how the wrong candidate may nevertheless be chosen.

III — At Work

In At Work, the metaphysical claim finally produces its own evidence. Billy’s friends are transfigured into the beings he has invoked, and David—the formerly buttoned-up academic—becomes a conspicuously trendier Demiurge employed on a temporary basis. I wanted to imagine bureaucracy and cosmology as interchangeable systems: identities become job descriptions, supernatural authority becomes precarious employment, and Billy is interviewed by the very reality his answer has brought into being.

The film moves from casual advice into a shared vision of Gnostic concept of the “Hypostasis of the Archons”, before returning without explanation to the sober rituals of appointment. Billy may truly be an archon; David may simply have invented the right answer; or the vision may belong to some collective disturbance that none of the characters can interpret. The film deliberately refuses to decide. Institutions themselves frequently depend upon collective acts of faith, and a declaration can acquire value merely because everyone agrees to behave as though it means something.

Beneath the film’s brisk and excessive comic surface is a question about identity: are we what we are, what we say we are, or what other people are prepared to recognise?

Performers familiar from my earlier films—including the characters associated with Mina and David—reappear here in different roles. Their recurrence creates a small repertory world in which familiar people are continually given new identities and new “specifications”.

The final celebration supplies no proof that Billy is an archon. It offers something much more worldly: evidence that saying so worked.